Is Corn Planting To Blame For Unusual Bee Losses?

Sponsored by Disaster In The Making by Dr Henk Tennekes

In this special series called “The Neonicotinoid View”, host, June Stoyer and special guest co-host, Tom Theobald talk to commercial beekeeper, Steve Ellis about an unusual bee mortality event due to corn planting. Steve Ellis owns the Old Mill Honey Company which operates roughly 2,300 hives of bees in Minnesota for honey production and pollination for crops in California. Steve is the secretary of the National Honeybee Advisory Board (NHAB) and has been involved in pesticide issues for the past 15 years.

Dead bees from neonicotinoid treated corn.

Dead bees found after corn planting in neighboring field.

Interview Highlights:

June Stoyer: Steve, please begin by telling our audience about yourself and your experience as a commercial beekeeper.

Steve Ellis: I have been a commercial beekeeper for the last 32 years. I operate a commercial bee operation that’s migratory between Minnesota and California I call Old Mill Honey Company.

Tom Theobald: What do you think the economic impact is going to be for an operation of your size?

Steve Ellis: I do describe this as an extreme depopulation event. BayerCropLife was out, did a thorough report and investigation of my incident last year. Their conclusion was that (in their report) which they provided me and is public, that the bees had an exposure. The lab results coming back with a chemical detection was indicative and confirmatory of an exposure event to this chemical. Then, they didn’t go as far as to say what effects that exposure event might have on bees.

Old Mill Honey Company hives

Old Mill Honey Company operates roughly 2,300 hives of bees in Minnesota.

June Stoyer: What sources of water are available for your hives in this particular location?

Steve Ellis: Water is a question and also another potential contaminant route for Clothianidin. The state came out and took some samples of surface water. What bees are using for water is surface water. Surface water and low kind of kind of sloughy areas where there is roots and moss and things where they can land upon. Bees don’t like to gather water from a big deep water sources because they are really good fliers but they are just terrible swimmers. If they get into water and deep water, they drown pretty easily.  They want to go to a wet, spongy kind of source that they can land, stay dry, suck the water up and fly away. So, here I have those kinds of sources that are low, spongy areas. That is where they go. There are a number of identified spots I showed the investigators to take water samples. That is a particular mechanism that this chemical could be getting into the water that they are feeding on and bringing back to the hive as well.

A bee drinking water.

A bee drinking water. Photo: aboutbees.org

June Stoyer: Tom, could you please recap for our audience exactly what the sub-lethal effects of neonicotinoids are?

Tom Theobald: Just recently we have seen a report that was issued by the EPA and USDA where they essentially put pesticides at the bottom of the list. They said there were many factors associated with the problems we are seeing with the bees but if you look at the science with an open mind, what the science shows us is that these systemic pesticides have a variety of modes of action from very subtle to very dramatic. What we are talking about today is one of the more dramatic, more immediate affects.

Effectively, these systemic pesticides open the synapses. They open the neural connection and the bee is essentially just firing to death -its nervous system has gone crazy. These are neurological toxins. There are many other ways that they can have an effect on a colony of bees that may not show up for weeks. They can interfere with their homing ability, with their memory, with their navigation ability, with their grooming ability. Grooming is very important in a social community like the bees. That’s how the pheromones; the scents are transferred within the colony. The work of Dr. Henk Tennekes in Holland has shown us that the effect on the synapses is cumulative and irreversible. The conclusion from that is that there is no safe dose and in fact, if death is the end point, it takes thousands of times less of this product to produce that same effect if it is administered in tiny amounts over time, which appears to be what’s happening in the environment.

Listen To The Entire Interview:

 

Read Steve Ellis’s Incident Report Submitted to EPA:

Bee Kill incident in stockpile location Elbow Lake, MN –May 7, 2013 (Official Incident Report to US EPA)

Old Mill Honey Company operates roughly 2,300 hives of bees in Minnesota; during the summer months we operate principally for honey production, and in California during the winter principally for overwintering and paid almond pollination. April is a very busy month for us as the bees are transported from California to Minnesota.

The beehives are located on an approximately 60 acre piece of property owned by a gravel company, currently not in active use.  Bees were observed dead in front of the hives, as well as crawling on the ground unable to fly, some exhibited trembling and twitching on their backs unable to right themselves.   We observed a farmer out planting corn in the field adjacent to the beeyard (east)  wind was blowing from the east SE.

As soon as I realized that this was a pesticide poisoning, I called John Peckham at the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) to report a bee kill and request a pesticide inspection to determine the responsible chemical.  At 4:00 pm Tuesday May 7th I left a voice mail for him to contact me regarding a bee kill incident.  I also called EPA incident officer Bob Miller, and BCS David Fischer.

View Footage From Steve’s Hives

Thursday May 8th, the MDA sent out a field inspector, Mike Fick to sample for pesticide poisoning.  I met Mike at 11:00 am and led him to the bee location 4 miles east of Elbow Lake Minnesota. A MDA case file was established: MWF148000103

Mike sampled willow flower blossoms, because these weeds are heavily flowering at the borders of the corn fields.  Bees had been gathering nectar and pollen primarily from this one source.  Stunned or immobilized bees were observed in large numbers on the willow flowers, and they were brushed off to obtain blossom samples.

While gathering the dead and dying bees on Wednesday with Mike, we observed many healthy bees attempting to fly off with dead or dying bees in an attempt to get them further away from the hives.  Two dead queen bees were found and placed with the other dead bees in the sample.  Dead and dying bees were observed at distances of several hundred yards away from the hives, indicating that many had flown off to die.  Bees immobilized or stunned looking were stuck to the flowers unable to fly, moving very slowly.  He asked if they were chilled, not at this temperature (68 F) I replied.

David Fischer of BCS called on Thursday to follow up on this incident, and wanted to arrange for a site visit by himself and a bee expert.  I indicated that I would be receptive as long as they would share any findings of theirs with me.  He tentatively set up Monday, May 13 for that inspection.  He suggested that his field rep Mark Wrucke, could come out and gathered samples on Thursday, May 9th.  Mark and I gathered samples of dead bees and spastic twitching bees from each of the 3 major groupings.  Mark also gathered up samples of willow buds as well as immobilized bees on the willow blossoms.  He dug up a seed and by the color identified it as a DeKalb variety.

There were 1,312 hives of honey bees present in the holding yard on May 7, 2013.  The replacement value of these bees at this time of year 9 if you could get them at all) would be $155 min. per hive or $203,360.  Strength and long term viability of the hives is in question both for the upcoming honey production season as well as next season’s pollination contracts.  Strength and viability are critical factors for both endeavors.  All of the hives exhibited unusual mortality symptoms described above.

Steve Ellis
President
Old Mill Honey Co.

Joel Salatin Explains Why,”Folks, This Ain’t Normal!”

Sponsored by Eden Organics

What Does Real Food Look Like?

Thanks to decades of clever mass marketing campaigns, the average person has become completely disconnected with how our food is grown and also what real food should look like. With the agro-chemical companies chiming away that “there is going to be a food shortage if we don’t produce more food and decrease the world population in order for everyone to survive,” the reality is most people do not have a clue as to how their food is produced, where it is grown or how it is grown.

food

Most people have no idea how their food is grown, much less who grows it!

The Disconnection Factor

Processed foods, initially created with the intention to save time, are simply not a healthy choice.  Some of these processed, ready to “heat and serve” products made with “real chicken” are breaded, seasoned and disguised in all sorts of geometrical shapes so that children will be encouraged to eat them. Meanwhile, the average child who primarily consumes this type of food has no idea what a chicken looks like, sounds like or the fact that chickens are smart, loving beings.

Chicken Nuggets

As Frank Purdue used to say, parts is parts, but are they safe to eat? (Photo:Ludovic Bertron)

People are so disconnected to food! Today, you can buy chicken that is boneless, skinless, know nothing about it other than that it is heat and serve.

When I asked Joel Salatin about the growing he said, “As a culture, we essentially abdicated our responsibilities and kind of by faith we gave over this food responsibility to others over several couple of decades to where we are at the point now in our country where we have twice as many people incarcerated in prison as we have growing our food, which is again, a very aberrant civilizational statistic. It’s the first time it’s ever been done.

We are absolutely a guinea pig culture, flirting with abnormalities on a scale that no civilization has ever even thought of and the fact is you cannot have an integrity food system when you have the level of disengagement and lack of participation that we have in the culture.”

Listen To The Interview:

It takes a true organic farmer to really get the point across about the benefits of growing organics and eating organics. Joel Salatin is an organic farmer from Virginia who talks about the problems he sees not only as an organic farmer but as a consumer of organic foods. In his best-selling book, Folks, This Ain’t Normal: A Farmer’s Advice for Happier Hens, Healthier People, and a Better World, he takes us into his world as he talks about how our food is produced and why we ought to take a closer look at where and how our food is produced.

Click on the video below to listen to this segment of The Organic View Radio Show, as host, June Stoyer is joined by special guest Joel SalatinClick this link to use our free podcast player to hear the interview!

Food Labeling & Food Integrity: What Happened?

Food labeling is very controversial for many reasons. While some people think it is the big corporations out to get us, the reality is, the laws are designed to benefit the large scale producers. How should consumers view labels and what should consumers do beyond labels?

During the Great Depression, a flood of inferior food products threatened the integrity of the food supply. The 1938 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act set legal standards for most staple foods. In the year 2013, anywhere in the United States, it is still not mandatory to label products containing GMO’s on the label. Who are these laws protecting now? Have the laws intended to initially protect consumers changed to protect manufacturers?

food mislabeled

Salad Bouquet a weakened vinegar labeled “for use like vinegar”; Peanut Spred had few peanuts and much lard; and Bred-Spread had no strawberries, just pectin, dye, flavoring and hayseeds to simulate strawberry seeds.

Joel Salatin continued the conversation by saying,”the whole labeling issue is monstrous. We’ve never claimed anything. We just say eggs, T-bone steak, ground beef, pork chops. We don’t claim anything. Now we have to put these nutritional labels on. Which of course would cost several hundreds of dollars per item. So we can’t afford, as a small farm, nutritional labels that are accurate to what we produce but the USDA says, that’s not a problem, you can use the generic label. So, we slap the generic label on, which is in many cases 300-even 500% off of our Riboflavin or folic acid or omega 3, omega 6 ratios.

labels for food

Do food labels really benefit consumers? When is a salad more than a salad?

Our label on our food that we have to put on by law, is as wrong as night and day, doesn’t bear any semblance to the food that we produce but the labeling laws, in order to customize them so that they are actually accurate to our food would cost us thousands of dollars, which we don’t have and so the whole thing is just a joke.

They (industry) are making it so that it is impossible to own and operate a small farm or what the big picture is, they are looking to wipe you (small farmers) out. This is business. This is the cost of operations. This is what is being forced upon a small business owner who owns and operates a farm.  Period.

Generally speaking… food laws, whether they are food safety laws, whether they are labeling laws, whether they are infrastructure laws, whatever the regulations. The zoning, whatever they are, they are always prejudicial toward the biggest players and against the small players. The regulations are not scalable. They are scalable up very very well but they don’t scale down. What happens is every time we have a revamping of food safety laws, of the regulatory structure you always see the small players get inordinate punches on the chin, because the regulations are not scalable. That’s what people need to understand. That’s one ready why I advocate food choice. I think it is an amazing thing in our country now that we collectively believe that it is perfectly safe to feed your kids twinkles, Cocoa puffs, and Mountain Dew but if you feed raw milk, or compost grown tomatoes or Aunt Matilda’s homemade pickles, those are hazardous substances. The health and sickness statistics certainly don’t bear that out and yet that’s where we’ve come to.”

Responsibility For Your Food = Responsibility For Your Health

You write about how people need to take responsibility. How can we reconnect ourselves and our families?

Joel Salatin Photo Credit Teresa Salatin

Joel Salatin Photo Credit Teresa Salatin

Joel Salatin replied, “you cannot have people taking responsibility for the visceral parts of their lives without putting attention on that in the home. Homes used to be the centerpiece of everything that was important in life. Now home has become simply a pit stop between everything that’s important in life that happens outside. This is part of this crisis of participation that we don’t even participate in our family lives or our home lives anymore. All of our participation is outside.

Eating together as a family, cooking together. In the book, I talk about all of the learning possibilities (a kitchen can almost become a chemistry lab). It can become a learning center. Then beyond that, take them out to a farm. People don’t bat an eye at Bambi and Thumper, Disney vacations, or Caribbean cruises or summer camps and that entails a lot of money and a lot of time. Take the year off from that, take that budget of time and money that you would have normally spent recreationally like that and go find your farm treasures, your food treasures in your community.

Disneyland

Photo credit: Wikipedia

What will happen then is that you will gradually build an informed platform from which you can make proper decisions. You will begin to learn (that’s good farming, that’s bad farming.) You will be able to smell (that’s good food, that’s bad food) You will be able to see (that’s good food, that’s bad food). As you develop that experiential immersion in food from farm all the way to table, obviously, with kids, more is caught than taught. If we see that something is important, kids usually think it is important too. Once they start tasting it and seeing the difference…then, they are ready for it.

It does make a significant difference impact and effects how they not only live their lives but also their food choices. If they (kids)have the respect for the land and if they have the respect for nature, that is going to really make a significant impact in their overall disposition throughout the rest of their lives.”

Crisis Of Participation

The children really are our future. Whether you are a parent, a responsible adult or just someone who wants to make a positive change, we have to set the example for the younger generations.

“Once you are taught the knowledge, especially children that possess that knowledge they take that with them for the rest of their lives. It does make a significant impact and affects how they not only live their lives but also their food choices and how they carry themselves throughout their lives.

If they have the respect for the land and if they have the respect for nature, that is going to really make a significant impact in their overall disposition throughout the rest of their lives,” said Joel Salatin.

Crisis Motivation

When people do pay attention it is usually when they have a either a personal health crisis or someone that they love has a health crisis. That is when the light bulb goes off and then they start paying attention to not only where is the food grown, how is the food is grown, but who is growing it and what methods are they using to grow it.

According to Joel Salatin, “a healthy 50% of the visitors that come to our farm or take our seminars are conservative homeschoolers who opted out of the institutional education system, found it soul satisfying and said, well, good grief! What else am I missing? The whole idea to opt out of the mainstream thinking whether it’s investment, education, recreation, food, medical. What happens is there is one drip. Maybe, for some people it is that they bite the bullet and went to a chiropractor instead of, for example, a medical doctor. Then maybe the next thing you know they are going to a homeopath. Boy, what happens is when a person opts out of the conventional thinking and finds it beneficial, well, then they are screaming to find other things.

Positive changes that you can really taste and get a hold of are magnetic. They attract you to take the next step.”

Real Food Rots

Have you ever wondered about what preservatives do to our food? Anything that has a shelf life for several years is not as nature intended it to be.

Real food rots!

Real food rots!

Joel Salatin explained, “when food gets processed,when you take the ingredients in DiGiornio’s frozen pizza for example, frozen microwavable pizza, that pizza becomes a totally different critter than the raw ingredients that went into it. That’s true for practically everything from chicken nuggets to whatever to cheerios. I remember reading well decades ago reading about Wheaties and that you could take wheaties and feed rats and the would die but if you took the raw ingredients that were listed on the label and feed rats, they were perfectly healthy.

Living food spoils precisely because it IS alive! The fact is, there are a lot of things that are done to food. Take for example, Velveeta cheese. Cheese that squirts out of a tube? Folks, this ain’t normal! Good food should rot! If you take Velveeta cheese and set it on your table and then get some real cheese from somebody, in 24 hours, the real cheese will have a little mold on it. I don’t know how long Velveeta will sit there with no mold but it’s years!”

Velveeta

Photo: Wikipedia

Velveeta Ingredients: Milk, water, milkfat, whey, milk protein concentrate, whey protein concentrate, sodium phosphate, contains less than 2% of salt, calcium phosphate, lactic acid, sorbic acid as a preservative, sodium alginate, sodium citrate, enzymes, apocarotenal (color), annatto (color), cheese culture.

Want to read the book? Click the image below to order a copy of Folks, This Ain’t Normal: A Farmer’s Advice for Happier Hens, Healthier People, and a Better World! 

Folks, This Ain't Normal book

Are Neonicotinoids Too Big To Ban?

Sponsored by Eden Organics

Neonicotinoids: A Billion Dollar Industry!

There has been a huge debate over the impact of Neonicotinoids, which are a class of systemic pesticides with a common mode of action that affects the central nervous system of insects, causing paralysis and death. Neonicotinoids are often applied as seed treatments. This basically means that the seeds are coated before planting occurs. Neonicotinoids also generate billions of dollars for the agro-chemical companies that manufacture these chemicals and are available not only for agricultural applications but also can be found in a myriad of garden products available all over the world.

boycott bayer

Photo: Graham White, Friends of the Bees. All these bees and invertebrates are killed by systemic neonicotinoid garden pesticides.

In a new Avaaz petition, pollinator advocates demand that AMAZON  stops selling Bayer’s Bee-Killing Garden pesticides.

Too Big To Ban?

As the peer-reviewed, independent scientific evidence mounts from reputable scientists around the world that neonicotinoids are the cause of global honeybee decline, the industry still claims that they are not to blame. The industry also argues that without these systemic pesticides, agriculture will suffer, resulting in crop failure.  Similar to the big banking conglomerates and other industries that are “too big to fail”, are neonicotinoids the next to join this lineup?

honeybee decline caused by neonicotinoids

photo credit: USDA

During this interview, Walter Haefeker, President of the Professional European Beekeeper’s Association, stated, “I think there is a big parallel, this agricultural disaster, that they are producing, is very similar to the banking crisis. Where we all know what mistakes were made but nothing is being done about it and the argument is, they are too big to fail and their executives are too important to prosecute. So in the case of neonics, the situation is that the industry is claiming our products are ‘too big to ban’.

This is certainly unacceptable to the beekeeping community and should also be unacceptable to anybody caring about pollinators, songbirds and a healthy environment, in general. You have to also keep in mind that their compilation of the all of the negative economic effects of the ban basically assumes that there is no other way to do agriculture but there is plenty of evidence that smart farmers can work without these products.

corn field

(Photo credit: USDA)

In Italy, before they instituted their neonicotinoid ban, they commissioned a study and they not only looked into the impacts that they found on the honeybees but also part of the study was to try to grow corn (which was the main crop that was causing problems there) so they tried to grow corn without neonicotinoids and they did a side by side comparison. The loss in yield was basically non-existent. The corn production in Italy, after they did their local ban, actually increased! So, some of this is just scare tactics.

Certainly farmers for certain crops would have to learn a few new tricks or do some crop rotation. We might have a little more diversity in agriculture afterwards but there are plenty of good reasons to do that anyway.

One of the arguments is that these products are essential, for the current farming economy. Farmers have to have these products available. There are certain crops where no other approved insecticide is available therefore they are assuming that if you take these insecticides away, farmers will suffer severe economic losses.”

 

“Sustainable Intensification”- The New Industry Buzz Word!

Sustainable agriculture has existed for hundreds of years without chemicals.

County agent and a farmer examine seed corn. The farmer placed the corn seed on his porch to dry in Payette County, Iowa in September 1936. Photo courtesy National Archives and Records Administration.

When I asked Walter Haefeker to explain what the industry’s new buzz word “sustainable intensification” all about, here was his response:

“I first learned about this at an event (Syngenta sponsored event) in Brussels. Right now, they (industry) are trying to convince politicians around the world that the world population is exploding. We are going to have to feed 9 or 10 billion people in a few decades.  The way to do that is to use the available resources, land and water, even more intensively. Since everybody already understands that we’re probably already going too far with this intensification, they have found a new buzz word for what they want to do and this is called ‘sustainable intensification.’

When I first hear it, it reminded me of “clean coal”. It is essentially an oxy-moron. It is also not what a major UN effort a few years ago came up with when they were asked to come up with way to feed the growing world population. There is a world agricultural report that came to very different conclusions than what the industry is pushing right now. “

 

Listen To The Interview:

Walter Haefeker next to at the honeybee.

Walter Haefeker (left) & Dr. David Mifsud (right) at an ancient apiary in Malta.

In this special series called “The Neonicotinoid View”, hosts June Stoyer and guest co-host, Tom Theobald will be joined by the President of the Professional Beekeeper’s Association, Walter Haefeker to discuss “The Value of Neonicotinoid Seed Treatment in the European Union”.  Please listen to the interview below. You can also subscribe to our feed directly by clicking here or on iTunes by clicking here.

EU Vote On Neonicotinoids In Limbo As EPA Sued Over Bee-Toxic Pesticides

Sponsored by Austrian Pumpkin Seed Oil

EFSA Identifies Risks To Bees From Neonicotinoids

The world took notice as a press release issued in January 2013, by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSRA), concluded that systemic pesticides called neonicotinoids posed a serious threat to bee health. EFSRA defines neonicotinoids as “a class of insecticides with a common mode of action that affects the central nervous system of insects, causing paralysis and death. A number of recent studies have suggested that exposure to neonicotinoids at sub-lethal doses can have significant negative effects on bee health and bee colonies.

CanolaBlooms

Canola Blooms

Given the importance of bees in the ecosystem and the food chain and given the multiple services they provide to humans, their protection is essential. With its mandate to improve EU food safety and to ensure a high level of consumer protection, EFSA has an important role to play in ensuring their survival. The Authority’s review of neonicotinoids is one element in a range of activities it is undertaking on bee health. EFSA has recently completed a review of all its activities related to bees and is now identifying data and research gaps.”

Making The Case

One Member of the European Parliament, Mr. Alyn Smith, spoke up in a powerful statement by staying, ”I have been saying this for some time: the worrying decline in bee numbers is, at least in part, caused by toxic chemicals sprayed on our fields.  I simply do not see how any other conclusion is possible based on the evidence available, not least after the EFSA study found clear links between the use of the chemicals and damage to bees.”

rapeseed

Rapeseed (Brassica napus), also known as Rape, Oilseed Rape, and Rapa, is used in the production of animal feed, vegetable oil for human consumption, and biodiesel. This is one of the key crops which are treated with neonicotinoids.

The Vote Heard Round The World

After the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) deemed the use of neonicotinoids to be an unacceptable risk, the European Commission proposed a two year ban across the continent, on the use of three neonicotinoids (Imidacloprid, Clothidanidin and Thiamethoxam) from use on corn, oil seed rape, apples, carrots, strawberries and many other flowering crops in order to further assess the environmental impact. Last Friday, March 15, 2013, there was a vote by the European Commission and the ban failed to pass by the majority. Although key countries such as Germany and the UK failed to back the plan, environmentalists, beekeepers and scientists are hopeful because there is a great chance that it can pass by the appeals committee.

honeybee

Honeybee (Photo credit: CSBA)

Listen To The Interview 

As we continue our special series called “The Neonicotinoid View”, host, June Stoyer and guest co-host, Tom Theobald, will be joined by Mr. Alyn Smith, who is a Member of the European Parliament. Mr. Smith is also a member of the European Parliament’s Agriculture and Rural Development Committee. We will be discussing his position on neonicotinoids as well as the situation with the proposed ban.

Later on in the show, environmentalist, bee health advocate and beekeeper, Graham White, who has been campaigning against neonicotinoids, will explain the recent developments in Europe with the proposed ban. Listen to the interview using the video player below. You can also subscribe to our feed directly by clicking here or on iTunes by clicking here.

 

Beekeepers & Environmental Groups Get Ready To Rumble With The EPA

In a press release titled, Beekeepers and Public Interest Groups Sue EPA Over Bee-Toxic Pesticides, dated March 21, 2013, a law suit was filed against the EPA by the following beekeepers and environmental groups over bee-toxic pesticides:

  • Steve Ellis of Old Mill Honey Co. (MN, CA),
  • Jim Doan of Doan Family Farms (NY),
  • Tom Theobald of Niwot Honey Farm (CO)
  • Bill Rhodes of Bill Rhodes Honey (FL)
  • Beyond Pesticides,
  • Center for Food Safety,
  • Pesticide Action Network North America,
  • Sierra Club,
  • and the Center for Environmental Health.

The suit was filed due to administrative failure by the EPA to ensure that honeybees and other pollinators, birds, and the environment are protected. The abuse of conditional registration to push through bee-toxic chemicals is also cited.

Beekeepers and Public Interest Groups Sue EPA Over Bee-Toxic Pesticides

Image credit: bhs.bboed.org

One of the plaintiffs,  Steve Ellis, stated, “America’s beekeepers cannot survive for long with the toxic environment EPA has supported. Bee-toxic pesticides in dozens of widely used products, on top of many other stresses our industry faces, are killing our bees and threatening our livelihoods,” said plaintiff, Steve Ellis, a Minnesota and California beekeeper. “Our country depends on bees for crop pollination and honey production. It’s time for EPA to recognize the value of bees to our food system and agricultural economy.”

According to the EPA’s website, its mission states that the EPA’s purpose is to ensure that:

  • all Americans are protected from significant risks to human health and the environment where they live, learn and work;
  • national efforts to reduce environmental risk are based on the best available scientific information;
  • federal laws protecting human health and the environment are enforced fairly and effectively;
  • environmental protection is an integral consideration in U.S. policies concerning natural resources, human health, economic growth, energy, transportation, agriculture, industry, and international trade, and these factors are similarly considered in establishing environmental policy;
  • all parts of society — communities, individuals, businesses, and state, local and tribal governments — have access to accurate information sufficient to effectively participate in managing human health and environmental risks;
  • environmental protection contributes to making our communities and ecosystems diverse, sustainable and economically productive;
  • and the United States plays a leadership role in working with other nations to protect the global environment.

According to statistics from the American commercial beekeeping community,  the USA has already lost over 70% of its commercial honeybees. With peer-reviewed scientific evidence accumulating from renowned scientists such as Dutch Toxicologist, Dr. Henk Tennekes, Dr Alex Lu (Harvard), Dr. Francisco Sánchez-Bayo (Australia) and Dr. Christian Krupke (Purdue), Dr. Goulson (UK), the neonicotinoid issue is not just about honeybees but clearly has become a global crisis.

The Practical Stepping-Stones For Beating Cancer With NLP

Do we cause our own illnesses?

Psychosomatic disorders are well known and accepted causes for multiple diseases involving the mind (psyche) and body (soma). For example, when we are afraid or anxious adrenaline is released often producing several of the following symptoms: a fast heart rate, fast breathing, wide eyes, palpitations, feeling sick, shaking (tremor), sweating, dry mouth, chest pain, headaches and a knot in the stomach. This is the body’s way of protecting itself, creating the flight, fright and fight response which increases the body readiness to react. Some physical diseases are thought to be made worse by mental factors such as stress and anxiety. However, the term psychosomatic disorder is mainly used to mean … “a physical disease that is thought to be caused, or made worse, by mental factors”. Some people also use the term psychosomatic disorder when mental factors cause physical symptoms, but where there is no physical disease. For example, a chest pain may be caused by stress, and no physical disease can be found. Whichever way the disorder is interpreted, it clearly shows that the mind and body impact upon each other.

Stress, Anxiety, Worry

Are you Stressed, Anxious, Worried?

The Mind Body Link